The Blitz Always Leaves Something Open

In football, if the quarterback has all afternoon to stand in the pocket, the defense has a problem.

He can look at one receiver, move to the next, check the safety, adjust his feet and wait for somebody to come open. So the defense changes the conditions.

It sends another player after him.

Blitz.

Now the quarterback has less time, less space and a large human being moving toward him with violent intentions. The play may be the same, but the environment is not. A comfortable decision became an urgent one in about half a second.

That is pressure.

The car business understands this too.

This incentive ends tonight. Someone else looked at the vehicle. The price is only good today. The manager needs an answer. Put a clock beside almost any decision and watch the decision change.

Pressure is powerful because it narrows the field. We stop evaluating every option and start searching for the fastest way to make the feeling go away.

That distinction has cost me before.

There have been times when I thought I was solving a problem but was really trying to escape the discomfort created by the problem. Those are not always the same thing.

The bill is due, so the credit card provides relief. Pressure reduced. Larger problem scheduled for later.

The argument is uncomfortable, so we say whatever ends it. Pressure reduced. Actual disagreement still sitting there, now with an additional layer of dishonesty.

The job feels unbearable, so walking out immediately feels like freedom. Maybe leaving is correct. But freedom becomes considerably less free when the next round of bills arrives and no plan came with it.

Immediate relief is seductive because it works immediately.

The problem is that a tourniquet and healing are not the same thing.

Here is the part of the football metaphor I find most useful: the extra defender has to come from somewhere.

If a linebacker charges the quarterback, he is no longer covering the same part of the field. Pressure creates danger, but it also creates exposure. Beat the blitz and there may be a receiver standing alone with open grass in front of him.

The quarterback can miss that because the threat is so obvious. Staring exclusively at the person trying to flatten you is an understandable response.

Life creates the same tunnel.

A money problem can make the entire world look like money. A relationship problem can consume every thought. A crisis at work can convince us nothing exists beyond the building. The pressure becomes the only thing on the field.

But the blitz always leaves something open.

A crisis at work may reveal the person who can lead when the usual leader is unavailable. Tight finances may finally expose spending that never mattered as much as it claimed. A relationship reaching its breaking point may force the honest conversation comfort allowed both people to avoid. Losing one option may create enough necessity to build another.

I am not recommending crisis as a personal-development strategy. Life distributes those freely enough.

I am saying pressure changes the field. Do not become so fixated on what is charging toward you that you fail to notice what moved.

One chapter in A Nobody’s Guide to Self-Help grew from this question: What does pressure do to me?

Some people become reckless. Some freeze. Some get angry. Some agree to anything. One of my defaults under certain kinds of emotional pressure has been escape. Leaving first can feel safer than staying long enough to discover how something ends.

Pressure rarely invents a completely new person. It usually reaches for the response we have practiced.

That is why the middle of a crisis is a terrible place to invent your values.

Decide some things before the snap.

What will you not sacrifice for a job? How much financial risk are you willing to carry? What boundary does not move simply because someone becomes upset? Who has earned the right to advise you? What deserves an immediate response, and what deserves a night of sleep?

Preparation does not remove pressure. It keeps pressure from introducing you to yourself for the first time.

If something is bearing down on you now, acknowledge it. The linebacker may be real. Ignoring him would be stupid.

But look across the rest of the field too.

Are you solving the problem or only trying to stop feeling it?

Is the clock real?

What changed when the pressure arrived?

And what did the blitz leave open?

The Two Paths of Decision-Making

There is an infinite number of rabbit holes a person can find while using the internet. Some are dark and creepy. Others are light-hearted and funny. Many of them will find you wishing you had the time spent back, and a few of them may help you be more productive. One of my recent rabbit hole dives led me to The Knowledge Project, a podcast hosted by Shane Parrish. From that podcast, I found his website, The Farnam Street Blog, which provides articles and exposes that center on how and why we handle the process of decision making.

There are some fascinating articles on the blog and some fantastic interviews on the podcast. I would suggest checking either or both of them out. But one theme that pops up now and then is the idea of making decisions based on the probable outcome. More specifically, do you make decisions based on the best possible ending or eliminating the worst-case scenario?

fs.blog

Most people would probably pick like me and say the former rather than the latter before they put a lot of thought into it. On the surface, who wouldn’t want the “best possible outcome?” But when you look back on your life and analyze some of your decisions, is that what you did? And if not, do you regret it? Will you change the way you make your decisions going forward? Let’s look at two different scenarios and then think about how you handled or will handle them in your life.

Love

If you could see fifty years into the future when choosing who you will spend your life with, how does your ideal scenario play out? For me, it would be a lifelong love affair with someone I connect with on the deepest level. It would be hills and valleys but having them right there by my side the whole time. They would be by my side for the suffering and the joy, and we would share our experiences every step of the way. I’m sure everyone’s answer is a little different, but that’s what it would look like for me. On the flip side, though, what kind of roadblocks would you have to stumble over if you made your choice like that? How much would you overlook, and how far would you let it go?

But what if I decided to eliminate the worst-case scenario? I would probably settle down with someone financially secure who had good genes to pass down to our children. And, we would take those pictures in the fall with the trees in the background (to make sure the grandparents were pleased). I would probably even sacrifice passion and attraction for security and acceptance.

Now I’m not saying that you can’t have both, by the way. And, I’m not saying you’re wrong if you choose to go with the more safe and secure path. I think it’s interesting how we shape our lives by eliminating some of the variables that could leave us vulnerable in the end–nothing more and nothing less.

Career

The best-case scenario in your career would be sticking to the adage, “Find something you love to do, and you’ll never work a day in your life.” If you can take a passion, skill, or gift and find a way to monetize it over the long term, you will probably end up very fulfilled and satisfied when it is time to retire. But there are apparent risks while traveling down this path. How long do you have to wait before your passion becomes lucrative? How many times do you have to fail until you get it right? How does that affect your health and your family?

In this situation, the worst-case scenario is finding yourself broke and not providing for your family. How do you eliminate that? Most people decide to find a place that will pay them regularly, and they trade out that paycheck for 40 hours or more a week. There’s not much risk involved as most jobs won’t require a financial investment. If you can handle the workload and hours, you will have some change in your pocket at the end of the week after making enough money to provide for your family.

Again, there is nothing wrong with either one of these options. One is more romantic and risky, and the other is safe and secure. It just goes to show you how our decision-making process can shape the way our lives play out. The examples I mentioned above would be considered “major choices” in the long run. Still, we make these same kinds of differentiation in almost every micro decision we make daily.

How did it affect your most recent car purchase? What about your interaction with the person in line in front of you at the bank? Even when picking out what music to listen to on the road home or where to pick up takeout, we are constantly weighing the option of “best possible outcome” or “eliminating the worst-case scenario.”

I believe the key to living a satisfying life is finding the harmonious balance between these two ways of making decisions. After all, we are only the sum of our choices. Choose wisely, my friends! Too much risk may find us in the shower biting our knees in agony, but not enough of it may leave us cold and unfilled.