Category Archives: psychology

Lessons from a Floating Forest: Roots and Change

Nearly one hundred trees crossed a lake without ceasing to be a forest.

That sentence sounds like the beginning of a fable, but it happened on Williston Lake in British Columbia. A densely wooded island—roughly 500 feet long and 250 feet wide—appeared where no island was marked on any map. Then it vanished. Days later, it surfaced nearly twenty miles away.

According to reporting from The Guardian, the mass likely formed over years as plants and trees grew through layers of woody debris along the shoreline. Their roots became intertwined. When unusually high water lifted the whole thing loose, the island didn’t immediately fall apart. It moved as a community.

The trees were still rooted. They just weren’t stationary.

A densely wooded floating island carrying mature trees across a broad northern lake beneath an overcast sky.
Nearly one hundred trees crossed a lake without ceasing to be a forest.

I think we confuse those two ideas more often than we realize, especially in small towns. We talk about being rooted as though it means staying in the same job, the same role, the same relationship, or the same patch of ground forever. Remaining becomes proof of character. Leaving begins to resemble betrayal.

I’m guilty of this notion. One of my favorite things to tell people is, “My family has been scattered up and down Highway 22 for over two hundred years.”

But roots have more than one purpose. Some anchor a tree to the soil. Others hold soil together. Sometimes they do both. On that island, the same roots that once attached the trees to a shoreline became the thing that allowed an entire living world to survive after the shoreline let go.

That distinction matters to me.

I was shaped by Dardanelle, by Carden Bottoms, by family stories, church language, hometown traditions, and the kind of people who believe showing up matters even when nobody applauds it. None of that disappears if my life changes shape. I can leave a position without abandoning the people who taught me how to work. I can enter a new chapter without pretending the earlier chapters were wasted.

Gratitude for where you have been does not require a lifetime contract with who you have been there with.

Intertwined tree roots binding soil, moss, and young plants together at the edge of moving water.
Roots can do more than anchor us. They can hold a world together.

Still, movement is not painless. The island on Williston Lake is not gliding across the water like some peaceful little vacation spot. Its edges are thin and shaky. Mature trees sway in the chop. It is exposed to wind, current, and forces it did not choose. Nobody knows exactly where it will settle or whether it will remain intact.

That sounds more like change as I know it.

We like to tell stories about brave departures after we already know they worked out. From the safe side of the outcome, every hard choice looks like courage. In the middle of it, movement often feels like instability. It can make a person question his judgment, his loyalty, and even his identity. The old ground may have been limiting, but at least it was ground.

Fatherhood has taught me another version of this. We spend years trying to give our children roots, knowing that healthy roots are supposed to help them grow beyond us. The goal is not to make them stationary. It’s to give them something portable: a work ethic, a faith, a family story, a way of treating people, and a clear path home. A child can move forward without leaving the family behind because the family has already traveled inside him.

Towns can travel that way too. Dardanelle goes with me in the phrases I use, the stories I tell, the way I measure a person, and the instinct to notice who showed up when things got hard. Carden Bottoms is not only a location on a map. It is a memory carried inside of many people.

A father and three children walking together along a rural Arkansas levee road at sunrise.
What matters can travel with us.

Faith, at its best, understands this. It does not always promise that the shoreline will remain beneath us. Sometimes it asks us to trust that what has been formed in us can survive a change in geography, title, season, or circumstance. The destination may be uncertain without the movement being wrong.

Maybe being rooted has less to do with refusing to move and more to do with knowing what must move with you. Your values. Your people. Your stories. Your faith. The pieces that keep you recognizable when the landscape changes.

Some roots hold you to a place. Others hold you together while you move.

The Real Difference: Charisma vs. Character

Some people can control a room beautifully but can’t be trusted alone with making a decision.

You’ve probably met one. They remember names, hold eye contact, tell a story at exactly the right moment, and make the people around them feel smarter and more hopeful than they did before they arrived. By the time the coffee cools, the room belongs to them.

That is a real ability. It’s also incomplete evidence.

Charisma answers one question: How do people feel while you are speaking? Character answers a harder one: What becomes true because they trusted you?

I’ve spent most of my adult life in sales and leadership, two places where charm has a scoreboard. Good communication matters. A customer should feel comfortable asking a question. An employee deserves a leader who can bring clarity and hope into a difficult day. Eye contact, timing, confidence, stories, and good questions can all be learned. Learning them is not dishonest. Warmth can be a genuine form of service.

But the appearance of care can be learned faster than responsibility.

A warmly lit automobile showroom where a man speaks to an attentive group.

A salesperson can make a customer feel understood and still disappear when the paperwork is signed. A manager can fire up a room on Monday and avoid the truth when Friday brings bad news. A person can speak beautifully about faith and still use influence carelessly when there is no microphone nearby.

The same danger exists in relationships. It’s possible to know how to make another person feel special without knowing how to be honest, consistent, or responsible for the effect you have on them.

But charisma is not always a disguise.

I once dated a woman who had an unusual gift. Whoever she was speaking to—regardless of title, money, or station in life—felt like the most important person in the world. She listened in a way that made it seem as if the room had emptied around you.

That could have been charm alone. What convinced me otherwise came later.

Long after our relationship ended, she would reach out from time to time to ask how I was and remind me that she was still in my corner, rooting for me. There was nothing left to win. No audience. No advantage. Her care had outlived its usefulness.

A woman sends a quiet check-in message from a café at dusk.

That doesn’t mean every relationship between two good people should continue. Goodness doesn’t erase incompatibility, history, or the need for boundaries. It simply means her warmth was not manufactured for a result. The attention she gave people was connected to something sturdier than technique.

Manufactured sincerity asks a question to find leverage. Genuine presence asks because the answer matters.

We should not become suspicious of every charismatic person. Cynicism can be as lazy as seduction. Some people are naturally gifted with presence; others work to communicate better. The skill itself is not the moral issue. Character decides what the skill serves.

The test usually comes after the impressive part is over. Was the promise kept? Was the bad news delivered honestly? Was the phone call returned when there was nothing else to sell? Did the leader protect the absent person, admit the expensive mistake, and restrain the power he could have used for himself?

Character leaves evidence outside the spotlight.

A manager has a quiet, honest conversation in an almost-empty dealership at dusk.

I know how easy it is to confuse a good response with proof of a good heart. A successful meeting, a relieved customer, an energized team, or a kind comment from a reader can all feel like confirmation. But being convincing and being worthy of belief are not the same accomplishment.

If I want to know what kind of person I am becoming, the better question is not whether people enjoyed hearing me speak. It’s whether my family, coworkers, customers, and friends are safer because I told them the truth and kept my word.

Charisma may open the door, but character decides what you do after you are invited inside.

Source note: Inspired by Deepstash Daily’s summary of Robert Greene’s The Art of Seduction.

When Passion Becomes Competition in Your Relationship

“Your girlfriends are doing well.”

The words float across a backyard crowded with tomato cages.

A husband is inspecting leaves, tying vines, checking the soil, and speaking about heirloom varieties with the emotional intensity most people reserve for SEC football or minor surgery. His wife calls the plants “his girlfriends.”

It’s funny because it’s absurd.

It may also be funny because it’s true enough to sting.

Private jokes often carry two messages at once. The first says, “I know you, and I can tease you about this.” The second sometimes says, “I need you to notice what I am not quite ready to complain about.”

Humor lets us say a dangerous truth at a safer volume.

A husband tending an elaborate tomato garden while his wife watches from the porch.

That doesn’t mean every joke is a coded emergency. Sometimes a tomato is just a tomato, although gardeners rarely believe this. To them, it’s a responsibility, a science experiment, and apparently a personality test.

But teasing can function like a relationship’s smoke alarm. It doesn’t always mean the house is burning. It does mean we should probably check before removing the batteries.

The nickname matters because it gives the passion a role in the relationship.

The garden is no longer only a garden. The manuscript is no longer only a manuscript. The career, business, training plan, book launch, or side project has become another presence—one that receives attention, creates obligations, interrupts plans, and follows us into rooms where it wasn’t invited.

I understand how that happens.

Writing can begin as the part of life that makes everything else more meaningful. Then a deadline approaches, an idea finally starts working, or a book needs one more revision, and the work begins claiming territory. Dinner becomes inconvenient. A conversation gets postponed. The people we love receive the distracted version of us because the focused version has already been promised to the page.

The work may be worthy.

That does not make every demand it places on us reasonable.

A writer absorbed in a manuscript while his wife waits beside two cups of coffee.

We like to imagine neglect arriving through obviously selfish pursuits. It would be easier if every threat to a relationship wore a black hat and introduced itself properly.

More often, the competition is something good.

A person works late because people depend on him. He trains because health matters. She serves at church because the need is real. He tends the garden because he finds peace there. I write because there are things I believe I’m supposed to say.

None of those explanations is dishonest.

They can still become alibis.

Passion is not guilty merely because it requires time. The people who love us should understand that meaningful work sometimes demands sacrifice. But passion isn’t automatically innocent merely because the work matters.

Someone still absorbs the sacrifice.

That’s the part ambition prefers not to itemize.

The clearest warning may not be an argument. It may be the same small joke repeated often enough that everyone learns their line. “You love that truck more than me.” “Go spend time with your computer.” “Your customers see you more than we do.” “How are the girlfriends?”

The first response is usually a defense.

“That isn’t fair.”

“I’m doing this for us.”

“You know how important this is.”

All three statements may be accurate. None of them answers what the other person is trying to say.

A married couple harvesting ripe tomatoes together in the evening light.

Listening doesn’t require surrendering the calling.

The tomato grower doesn’t need to rip up the garden and begin dividing custody of the Better Boys. The writer doesn’t need to close the laptop forever. The manager doesn’t need to stop caring whether the business succeeds.

The correction may be smaller and harder.

Put the phone away while she’s talking. Protect time with the same seriousness given to deadlines. Let a child interrupt without making him feel like an obstacle. Ask whether the people closest to us experience the purpose we talk about—or only the absence it creates.

Sometimes the best response to the joke is not another joke.

It’s an invitation.

Come sit with me. Tell me what I’ve been missing. Help me understand when this started feeling like competition.

He doesn’t have to tear up the garden.

He may simply need to invite his wife back into a life from which the garden has begun excluding her.

Returning Is Not the Same as Going Back

Seconds before Céline Dion sang the first note of her first full concert in six years, the stage probably looked much like it always had. Lights. Musicians. A waiting crowd. A microphone in the place where a microphone belongs.

But six years were standing beside her.

Illness had interrupted the life she knew. The return required years of physical and vocal work, and the road was longer and rougher than she expected. When she finally began, she became so emotional that the audience had to help carry the opening song.

That’s the part the word “comeback” usually leaves out.

A singer stands beneath a spotlight in the silent moment before beginning a return concert.

Comeback is a clean word. It makes absence sound like an intermission. It suggests someone stepped away, handled a problem, and returned to the same stage as the same person, ready to pick up exactly where she left off.

Real life is seldom that tidy.

Illness changes the person inside the body. Grief changes the person who walks back into the house. Divorce changes the person who tries to trust again. Parenthood changes the person who returns to ambitions he once imagined pursuing without interruption.

Even good change has a cost. We don’t pass through six years—or six months, or one terrible week—and remain untouched.

For a long time, I thought rebuilding meant restoring. I imagined there was an earlier version of my life sitting somewhere intact, waiting for me to find the right road back to it. If I could recover the right habits, confidence, relationships, or sense of direction, perhaps everything would feel familiar again.

But rebuilding is not restoration when the original materials have changed.

A middle-aged Arkansas writer returns to an old manuscript at a desk shaped by years of family life and change.

When I returned to writing seriously, I was not retrieving some untouched version of myself who had merely been waiting for an available afternoon. I brought the years with me: work, fatherhood, disappointment, grief, mistakes, and questions I could not have written honestly before I had lived them.

Some of those experiences reduced me. They took confidence, energy, and certainty. I would not insult anyone’s pain by pretending every loss secretly arrives as a gift. Some things hurt because they are hard, and some absences remain absences.

Still, reduced capacity does not automatically mean a lesser life.

Sometimes the person who returns is better than the one who left—not because the suffering was good, but because he learned to stop wasting what is. He may be slower but more patient. Less certain but more honest. Less impressed by appearances and more grateful for ordinary days. He may finally know which promises deserve his strength and which expectations never did.

That is a better version, even if the measurements we usually celebrate cannot detect it.

The hard part is allowing the new person to build a life he can actually inhabit. We can exhaust ourselves trying to perform at an old pace, recreate an old relationship, recover an old identity, or prove the interruption did not change us. Sometimes healing begins when we quit treating change as evidence of failure.

A man enters a familiar room again, carrying the evidence of the life that changed him.

Returning may mean singing differently. Working differently. Parenting differently. Praying differently. It may require boundaries the former version of us never needed, gratitude he never understood, and the humility to accept help when the first note will not come.

A return is still worth celebrating. But not because it erased the years away.

It is worth celebrating because the person who lived through them stood in the light as he was—changed, grateful, uncertain, and willing to begin again.

You can return to the stage, the work, the faith, or the relationship—but you cannot return as the person who left.

Sometimes that is not the tragedy. It is the gift.

Celebrating Unconventional Hobbies: The Hobby-Horse Phenomenon

The phrase “hobby-horse championship” practically arrives with its own smirk.

For an adult who has forgotten how seriously children can take play, the picture is easy: kids running around a gym with stuffed horse heads on sticks. Cute. Strange. Something to watch for thirty seconds before moving on.

But stay a little longer.

A young hobby-horse athlete clears a jump while fellow competitors and families watch inside an indoor arena.

This summer, 400 registered competitors gathered in Brighton, Michigan, for the U.S. Hobby Horse Championships. They ran jumping courses, performed dressage, and competed in rodeo-style events. Most were young girls. Many had designed and made their own horses and tack.

The championship itself began with four young athletes who met online in 2023. They didn’t wait for a school, league, or grown-up institution to decide their interest was legitimate. They built the competition they wished existed.

Stay long enough, and the smirk starts to lose its footing.

There is athleticism in the jump. Craftsmanship in the horse. Courage in performing something you love while knowing other people may laugh. There is friendship, practice, imagination, and the stubborn human need to find people who understand why a thing matters.

A young person carefully stitches a handmade hobby horse at a kitchen table while a parent watches nearby.

Adults are good at respecting a child’s interest after it becomes useful.

If it earns a scholarship, we call it dedication. If it makes money, we call it talent. If it fits neatly on a résumé, we call it well-rounded. But before any of that—especially when the interest looks odd—we often ask joy to explain itself.

Where is this going?

Can you make a living doing that?

What will people think?

We ask childhood to produce a business plan.

Fatherhood has shown me how easily anxiety can dress itself up as wisdom. We know the world can be cruel, so we try to protect our children from being embarrassed. Sometimes, though, our version of protection is to teach them embarrassment first. We offer the first small laugh. We suggest a more respectable interest. We make them feel foolish at home before somebody else can do it in public.

My children have brought me songs, drawings, games, sports, and ideas that did not arrive with a clear destination. Sometimes I understood the appeal immediately. Sometimes I had to resist grading the interest by whether I could picture it becoming a career.

That’s harder than it sounds.

We’ve been trained to look for proof. Yet some forms of intelligence announce themselves on report cards, while others appear when a child memorizes every detail of an imaginary world, edits the same song for the twentieth time, learns to stitch a bridle, or practices one jump until the body finally does what the mind can already see.

The child who seems ordinary inside an assigned format may come alive inside a chosen one.

That’s not a guarantee. It’s a clue.

Of course, honoring joy doesn’t mean funding every interest without limit or surrendering every boundary in the house. Parents still have to say no. Money is real. Time is real. Responsibilities are real. But there’s a difference between saying, “We cannot buy that,” and saying, “What you love is ridiculous.”

One sets a limit. The other turns a light down.

A father watches with quiet pride as his child practices a hobby-horse jump in a small-town Arkansas yard at dusk.

The interest may fade. Many do. The stick horse may end up in a closet beside some other season of childhood. That doesn’t make the joy wasted. A child may have learned to make something, practice something, risk being seen, and find a community. More importantly, the child might have learned whether the people at home made room for the parts of them the rest of the world hadn’t learned to value yet.

We don’t have to understand every enthusiasm our children bring us. We don’t have to pretend everything they make is excellent. Unconditional belonging is not the same as automatic approval.

But attention is not the same as approval either. Sometimes attention simply says: I see that this makes you more alive, and I will not make you ashamed of that.

A parent doesn’t have to understand the horse to recognize that the light in the child is real.

Sources: Morning Brew, “Youth Sports Brew” and Young Rider, “US Hobby Horse Championships Returns August 1, 2026 to Brighton, Michigan”.

The Uncertainty of Family History

In Liliana Colanzi’s essay “Tropical UFOs,” her mother and uncle agree that something extraordinary happened above a river in Bolivia. A spaceship came down. Strange light covered the witnesses. Then it disappeared toward the trees.

They disagree about almost everything that should be easier to remember.

Her uncle says they were children. Her mother remembers being married and returning from a funeral with several relatives. He remembers an abduction. She remembers an object hovering above them.

The other witnesses are dead.

That means the argument will never be settled—not because the event was too strange, but because the people who could compare the stories are gone.

Two people watch an unexplained light hovering above a tropical river at night.

The UFO is almost beside the point. Families lose track of ordinary facts all the time.

Someone I know grew up believing she was descended from a Cherokee chief. That was the story her mother had given her. Not merely Cherokee, either. A chief. Family legends rarely suffer from a lack of promotion.

Years later, the subject came up at a family reunion. Her aunt had heard a different genealogical story. The branches didn’t connect the same way. The confidence remained; the facts had started moving.

Eventually she took a consumer DNA test. The ancestry estimate came back entirely European.

Somewhere between her mother’s story, her aunt’s version, and the laboratory, the Cherokee chief quietly left the family tree.

A DNA estimate can’t perfectly reconstruct every person who ever contributed to a family. But it made one thing difficult to deny: the story she inherited as fact was not nearly as settled as it had sounded.

That doesn’t necessarily mean her mother lied. More likely, her mother repeated what somebody had once told her. Sincere people can pass along inaccurate stories with tremendous confidence. Family history often travels farther on certainty than it does on evidence.

Two relatives compare old photographs and genealogy papers during a family reunion.

That’s part of what makes writing about small towns and family history both important and dangerous.

Places changed by water, time, and people leaving do not preserve themselves in clean transcripts. They survive in kitchens, church foyers, old photographs, property lines, and stories told by people who assume everyone already knows the names.

One person remembers the year. Another remembers the weather. Somebody insists the truck was blue. Somebody else is equally certain it was green. The event may be real while the details refuse to stand still.

Writers feel pressure to fix that.

Readers prefer a date. They want one truck, one route, one version of what happened. Uncertainty can look like weak research, so the temptation is to choose the account that sounds best and sand away the disagreement.

But making the past neater does not make it truer.

A writer records an older person’s memories beside the Arkansas River near Carden Bottoms.

Sometimes the disagreement is the history.

The honest version may be: She remembered it this way. Her brother remembered it differently. No one is left who can tell us which one was right.

That sentence preserves more than doubt. It preserves two people. Their memories. Their loyalties. The different meanings the same event gathered as they carried it through life.

The work, then, is not only collecting stories. It’s collecting the edges around them. Who told you? Were you there? What part do you know, and what part did you hear? Did anyone else remember it differently?

Ask while someone can still answer.

Record the pause before the answer too.

Because when the last witness dies, we don’t simply lose another version. We lose the chance to measure one memory against another. What remains may still be beautiful, useful, and worth passing down. It just should not be dressed in a certainty it no longer possesses.

Sometimes “I don’t know exactly” is not a failure of storytelling.

It is the last truthful sentence available before silence.

Source note: Inspired by Liliana Colanzi’s “Tropical UFOs,” translated by Chris Andrews and published by Southwest Review.

The River Keeps What We Throw Away

After the water level falls, a riverbank can look like a drawer somebody pulled open and forgot to close.

Mud gives back pieces of bottles, rusted metal, buttons, tools, fishing line, and things too worn to name. Some were lost. Some were thrown away. Most entered the water without ceremony because the person holding them had no reason to imagine a stranger studying them generations later.

Time changes the category.

An object can spend two hundred years as trash and become history the moment another hand lifts it from the mud.

A mudlarker searches the exposed Thames shoreline and lifts a small weathered object from the mud.

The Wall Street Journal recently reported that roughly 10,000 people are waiting for permits to search the River Thames. At low tide, mudlarks move through layers of ordinary London life accumulated across centuries. Roman pottery may rest near a modern vape. A coin, buckle, pipe stem, or broken piece of tableware becomes evidence that somebody once stood there, worked there, ate there, or dropped something he assumed was gone.

The river did not preserve any of it because it understood its importance.

A river doesn’t curate. It doesn’t separate heirloom from garbage, tragedy from routine, or the final possession of a dead man from something tossed aside after lunch. It carries, buries, breaks, and exposes. Some debris is only debris. Some of it poisons the water. The river remains indifferent to every meaning we eventually place upon it.

That may be what makes the lesson honest.

The Arkansas River moves past Dardanelle without announcing which parts of our lives will matter later. History is happening in kitchens, fields, sheds, boats, church foyers, and front seats while everyone involved still calls it an ordinary day.

Low water exposes mud, driftwood, and fragments of ordinary life along the Arkansas River near Dardanelle.

We are poor judges of what an absence will make valuable.

My mother died at sixty. Grief changed the weight of ordinary things. An old photograph could knock the breath out of me, not because the paper had changed, but because the world around it had. The image became a place where someone could still be found.

That happens with more than photographs.

A phrase repeated so often that nobody bothered to record it can become the sentence everyone strains to remember. A tool is just a tool until the hands that used it are gone. A familiar drive, an unnoticed laugh, or an afternoon spent doing nothing special can become precious only after repetition is no longer possible.

We usually preserve the ceremonies. We photograph birthdays, graduations, weddings, and holidays. We assume Tuesday will take care of itself.

But much of what grief asks us to recover was hidden inside Tuesdays.

This is also the problem facing anyone who tries to preserve family or local history. We search for the dramatic story and overlook the ordinary instructions packed inside a saying, the name written on the back of a picture, the reason a certain road was avoided, or the small object nobody has thrown away because it still feels connected to a person.

Family photographs, a worn button, and an old hand tool rest on a kitchen table while someone records their stories.

We cannot save everything. We shouldn’t even try. A life can’t become a storage unit where every receipt and broken object demands reverence. Attention is not the same as accumulation.

Still, we could become better witnesses to the life in front of us. We could ask the question while the person who knows the answer is still sitting nearby. We could write the name on the photograph. We could listen once more to the story we think we already know.

The mudlark looks at what another person discarded and sees evidence. Grief often does the same thing. It teaches us, too late, that the mundane was carrying more life than we noticed.

Maybe what we call history is often the present, rescued too late from our inattention.

Sources: Wall Street Journal: “Why 10K People Are Waiting to Search the Thames”; Wall Street Journal: “Why 10,000 People Are Clamoring to Dig in London Mud”

Embracing Failure: Lessons from Ted Williams

I should be more consistent with writing. I don’t usually sit down and think of a particular topic to write about. Most of the time, it just comes to me. Just the other day, I was thinking about “failure.” I realized that many things I write about have failure as a central theme. I don’t consider myself an expert on anything, but if I were to bestow that title on myself in some regard, it would be “Master of Failing.”


To be honest, I’m not even mad about it. It took a while to learn, but once I figured out that failing was an important part of growing, I decided to embrace it. I’m not saying that I have never made the same mistake twice, but I feel like most of my failures are unique, and I use them to fuel growth and development.


I’ve been in the car business for almost 20 years. When you are a professional salesperson, failure is a constant factor. Even the best in the industry don’t sell to every customer they talk to. A GOOD salesperson should expect to close 30%- 35% of the customers they interact with. To put it in perspective, if a baseball player gets a hit one out of every three times he goes to the plate, he’s considered a Hall of Famer. Similarly, if a salesperson closes a sale with one out of every three customers, they’re doing exceptionally well.


That means that the best players in the game’s history fail two out of every three times they have an at-bat.


Today, I’m returning to 1941, when Ted Williams had arguably the best season at the plate in baseball history. He finished the ’41 season with a batting average of .406 with 37 home runs and 120 RBIs. To provide context, .200, the Mendoza line, is considered the low-end threshold for professional ball players. The average batting average of Hall of Famers is .303.


Williams played in 143 games that season and had 456 at-bats. But the breakdown of three particular stretches of that 1941 season interests me the most.


On April 30th, Williams entered the game hitting .462. Over the next four games, he hit .182, dropping his season average to .310.


By June 21st, he had battled his way back up to .415. But he only hit .318 over the next 21 games, dropping that average all the way down to .393.


His average peaked again at .413 during the heat of the pennant race in early September. But a .292 stretch over the next 17 games saw it drop right to the .400 mark near the end of the season. Entering the last day of the year, he was so close to the .400 mark that a bad day at the plate would have kept him from reaching that sacred number.


This is important because even though his season as a whole is considered extraordinary, not every day, or even week, was even considered average. But during those subpar stretches, Ted Williams didn’t panic. He didn’t change up his swing. He didn’t stay down in the dumps and stop coming to work. He showed up every day, stepped inside that chalk-outlined box, and did his job to the best of his abilities. And he let the chips fall where they may.


The most significant lesson I’ve learned about failure is that it’s interwoven into the fabric of success. It’s more about ‘fall, learn, grow’ than ‘pass or fail.’ These three unremarkable stretches of Ted Williams’ historic season wouldn’t impress anyone. But his resilience and determination during those times are just as, if not more, important than his successes.


We get so caught up in results that sometimes we lose focus on the processes. Instead of getting up and walking out of the pit of despair, we let ourselves get so deep that we can’t even climb out. We let our losses define us even though we may be on the cusp of a breakthrough. Our inactivity lets the tide sweep us back to the starting line when riding the wave will get us closer to our destination.


I used to tell kids when they’d ask me a question, “I wish I had it all figured out.” I don’t tell them that anymore because it isn’t true. I’m glad I don’t have it all figured out. My next failure is always right around the corner, and I’m excited to see what revelation it will lead to. I try (emphasis on “try” ) to be consistent and open-minded while keeping a positive attitude. In the words of the great poet Henry Longfellow: “Learn to labor and to wait.”


Show up. Stay the course. Keep your head high. Learn. Don’t quit. Don’t ever quit.

Clarity and the Responsibilities Which Come With It

As I sat in the pew every Sunday morning in church, I heard people pray for ‘clarity.’ As a kid, I didn’t understand what that meant. To me, life was simple—no responsibilities, no stakes. But as I grew older, I realized that clarity is one of life’s most sought-after yet elusive aspects. It’s what we crave when we’re faced with hard decisions and uncertain futures 

I’ve had many moments in my adult life where I did just that. All I wanted was a clear path to form before me. I’ve been faced with hard decisions and made tough choices without having enough information present. What I wouldn’t have given for an “eliminate the worst option” or “freeze time” card that could have helped me along the way. Or better yet, why can’t someone just make the RIGHT decision for me?

There is no proverbial light bulb that goes off. You don’t just scratch your head until you have your “aha” moment. Clarity comes when the tangled web of your experiences and your chaotic glimpse of the future magically line up. It’s when you know something must be done in a specific way or in a certain amount of time. In the sense I am writing about, clarity is seeing the best version of a particular part of your life and an actual path toward getting there.  It is more than just a moment of insight—it’s that instant when you know, without a doubt, what you need to do, whether it’s finally taking that job offer or walking away from a toxic relationship. 

This struggle and the challenge of its brother, hindsight, are not new; they’re as old as time, as seen in the story of Cain and Abel. We all know the story, and I believe that, more than anything, it is a vital allegory about personal responsibility. When Cain sees his brother’s treatment for his hard work and sacrifice, he realizes that he would be getting the same treatment if he had willfully performed the duties asked of him. We’ve all been there to a certain extent.

Imagine finding yourself at the bad end of a situation and then realizing YOU are the one to blame. Everything on the test was covered in class, but YOU didn’t study it. Your transmission goes out in your truck, but YOU blew your money instead of saving it. Your boyfriend breaks up with you because YOU didn’t take the time to learn how he needed to be loved.

Hindsight is 20/20, but clarity happens when you learn these things before it’s too late. Unfortunately, it’s not always as easy as studying for a test or saving money. The problems of life come with layers and complexity.

My grandma always said to be careful when praying for patience or courage because the Lord won’t just give it to you. You’ll have to earn it. He’ll give you opportunities to practice patience and put you in situations that allow you to be courageous. Those aren’t always the most popular places or events to be involved in. I’ve learned the same thing about clarity.

There is a sense of comfort and security in the ambiguity of the future. If you can’t tell what you COULD become, COULD obtain, or the relationships you COULD cultivate, then missing out on them doesn’t hurt. You never saw them and can’t lose what you never had. You can blame outside circumstances, timing, or many other things that are not in your control. You can easily avoid blaming yourself.

Clarity puts the responsibility squarely on your shoulders. It forces your decisions and actions to align with a target. Missing that target has tangible consequences. It requires you to be the best version of yourself so you can be ready to accept the blessings when they start pouring in. It means making multiple sacrifices in the present for what you will obtain in the future. This can be a tireless and trying task. It’s not the carrot at the end of a stick. It’s what awaits you after navigating through the labyrinth.  

Clarity is a powerful gift, but it’s also a call to action. It demands that we face the truth of our choices and take responsibility for our future. Whether we embrace it as a blessing or shy away from it in fear, clarity offers us a chance to shape our destiny. Either way, it’s one hell of a thing to experience. The question is: will we rise to the challenge?

Blades of Potential

Disclaimer: I always need to reiterate that if I write and publish it, I believe it. How we all apply it to our lives is the hard part. As much as I relate to these ideas, implementing them has sometimes been challenging. If this life can be “figured out,” I haven’t done it yet. Writing gets it from my brain to a place where I can think more clearly. Blog posts like this are a way to keep steering in the right direction.

I subscribe to a fantastic newsletter from Farnam Street called Brain Food. Here is the link if you want to sign up : https://fs.blog/newsletter/ The whole idea behind Farnam Street is to help you master the things that other people have already figured out. The weekly newsletter is a catalog of articles around the internet that help you see things through a different lens. A few months back, one of the feature articles reported from MIT on a study in which scientists were trying to figure out why razor blades were so easily damaged by hair.

If you’re like me, you’ve probably not thought much about the disposable nature of razors. More than likely, you buy a new pack when the old razors get dull. But when you think about it, it really is a bit odd that something made of stainless steel is damaged by something as soft as human hair. The article even mentions hair is 50 times weaker than steel, yet only a single piece can cause the edge to chip. Once one initial chip or crack is present, it becomes susceptible to more chipping, eventually causing the entire edge to become dull.

At this point in the article, I had an idea of what could cause the problem, but I wanted to read more to be sure. All I could think about was how our lives can be turned upside down, flipped around, and tossed about by small things that turn into big things. Sure, you can take a hammer to a razor blade and destroy it in a heartbeat, but more often, they get worn down over time until they eventually can’t work to their full potential. That sounds an awful lot like our lives as humans.

Here is a link to the article. Long story short, the team found three reasons that a blade could become more prone to chipping:

· The microstructure of the steel is not uniform

· The blade’s approaching angle to a strand of hair

· The presence of defects in the steel’s microstructure

I believe there are similar reasons we can become prone to “chipping” as well.

· Our foundation and governing principles are not uniform

· Our approach angle to our mundane, everyday tasks

· The presence of defects in our foundation (blind spots)

Developing our foundation and governing principles starts before we have any control over their creation. It begins with our genetics and parents, and over the years, other people come into our lives that help shape them as well. Friends, teachers, coaches, mentors–all have a huge role to play in our development. Eventually, we mature to a point where we begin to think independently, but our past relationships and experiences affect us in ways we couldn’t control, even if we wanted to.

Having different opinions on different topics is normal, but the things that we believe on a foundational basis are rarely if ever, changed. And if they are, you can bet it is a challenging process. When these principles are at odds with each other, they cause a rift, which leaves us as a prime target for internal conflict. “No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will hold to the one and despise the other.” — Matthew 6:24-26

To remedy this, we must do some soul-searching and figure out what we TRULY believe. We must know who we are and be conscious enough to understand that we can’t fool ourselves. If our actions don’t align with what we believe, then there is no uniformity in our microstructure, and it’s only a matter of time before our foundation starts to crumble.

Those actions are the second reason we don’t reach our potential. We get so caught up in the “big” parts of our lives that the daily tasks and how we perform them get lost in the shuffle. Martha Beck coined the phrase, “How you do anything is how you do everything.” If she’s right, that is one of the most profound statements I’ve ever read.

Our life really is a whole bunch of little things done over and over again and sprinkled with the occasional “big” thing. A 75-year-old man may take 50 family vacations over the years, but he has dinner with his wife 18,250 times over that same period. Which one of those is more important at the end of his life? Doing the little things right can be tedious and mundane, but how we approach and attack them can make all the difference in the world. 

Just like a blade can have defects in its microstructure, we, too, can have defects in our foundation. These blind spots can give us a false sense of how our world works. The great Persian poet Rumi said it best: “Yesterday I was clever, so I wanted to change the world. Today, I am wise, so I am changing myself”.

The most significant defect in our foundation is denying the prospect that we could be wrong about something—or everything. When we refuse to entertain the possibility that our ideas can be tested–and even changed– we reject the opportunity to grow into our full potential. 

Razor blades are disposable. It would make little sense to inspect each one at a microscopic level or study the effects of each shaving session on the edges of the blade. Our lives, though–they are anything but disposable. The great news is that if we create a strong foundation within ourselves, become open to learning and growing, and embrace the importance of the small things with passion, we can grow closer to unlocking our full potential. It may not make the pages of an MIT research magazine, but it will help make our small circle of influence exponentially better.